← Compare
Head-to-head · MMM & incrementality (measurement)
Measured vs. Prescient AI
Two ways to measure the media mix.
| Capability | Measured | Prescient AI |
|---|---|---|
| Core method | Geo incrementality experiments + Bayesian MMM | ML-based marketing-mix modeling |
| Proof style | Experiment-backed (test and measure) | Modeled (daily, pixel-free) |
| Speed | Experiment cycles | Daily updates |
| Budget guidance | Where to invest, test-validated | Daily campaign-level recommendations |
| Best for | Teams wanting experiment-proven incrementality | Teams wanting always-on modeled guidance |
Choose
Measured
Pick Measured if you want experiment-backed proof a channel is incremental before you move budget — especially for hard-to-track media.
Choose
Prescient AI
Pick Prescient AI if you want always-on, daily MMM and budget recommendations without running formal experiments.
Frequently asked
- Incrementality testing or MMM — which is more accurate?
- They're different tools: experiments give causal proof on the channels you test; MMM gives continuous, broad coverage. Many teams triangulate both.
- Does The Ad Spend replace either?
- No — it's the operational layer (change record + causal detection + action), not a channel-measurement model. It pairs with either.